10 October 2018

Accion Systems takes on $3M in Boeing-led round to advance its tiny satellite thrusters


Accion Systems, the startup aiming to reinvent satellite propulsion with an innovative and tiny new thruster, has attracted significant investment from Boeing’s HorizonX Ventures. The $3 million round should give the company a bit of breathing room while it continues to prove and improve its technology.

“Investing in startups with next-generation concepts accelerates satellite innovation, unlocking new possibilities and economics in Earth orbit and deep space,” said HorizonX Ventures managing director Brian Schettler in a press release.

Accion, whose founder and CEO Natalya Bailey graced the stage of Disrupt just a few weeks ago, makes what’s called a “tiled ionic liquid electrospray” propulsion system, or TILE. This system is highly efficient and can be made the size of a postage stamp or much larger depending on the requirements of the satellite.

Example of a TILE attached to a satellite chassis.

The company has tested its tech in terrestrial facilities and in space, but it hasn’t been used for any missions just yet — though that may change soon. A pair of student-engineered cubesats equipped with TILE thrusters are scheduled to take off on RocketLab’s first big commercial payload launch, “It’s Business Time.” It’s been delayed a few times but early November is the next launch window, so everyone cross your fingers.

Another launch scheduled for November is the IRVINE 02 cubesat, which will sport TILEs and go up aboard a Falcon 9 loaded with supplies for the International Space Station.

The Boeing investment (Gettylab also participated in the round) doesn’t include any guarantees like equipping Boeing-built satellites with the thrusters. But the company is certainly already dedicated to this type of tech and the arrangement is characterized as a partnership — so it’s definitely a possibility.

Natalya Bailey and Rob Coneybeer (Shasta Ventures) at Disrupt Berlin 2017.

A Boeing representative told me that this is aimed to help Accion scale, and that the latter will have access to the former’s testing facilities and expertise. “We believe there will be many applications for Accion’s propulsion system, and will be monitoring and assessing the tech as it continues to mature,” they wrote in an email.

I asked Accion what the new funding will be directed towards, but a representative only indicated that it would be used for the usual things: research, operations, staff expenses, and so on. Not some big skunk works project, then. The company’s last big round was in 2016, when it raised $7.5 million.


Read Full Article

50 Million Facebook Accounts Hacked: What Should You Do?


So much is going on each month in the world of cybersecurity, online privacy, and data protection. It’s difficult to keep up!

Our monthly security digest will help you keep tabs on the most important security and privacy news every month. Here’s what happened in September.

1. 50 Million Facebook Accounts Hacked

The last week of September threw up one of the biggest pieces of news: 50 million individual Facebook user accounts were hacked. Facebook reset the passwords of 90 million accounts, just to be sure, indicating that the final number of compromised accounts could rise.

Attackers exploited a vulnerability in Facebook’s “View As” feature, which allows users to see what their own account looks like to others. Facebook’s vulnerability stems from three bugs. The first allows the Facebook video upload tool to appear on the View As page. The second lets the upload tool generate an access code. A final bug lets the View As page generate an access code for whichever user the hacker wants.

The issue isn’t confined to the Facebook site, either. Other Facebook services such as Instagram are also vulnerable, along with sites and services using the now ubiquitous Facebook Login. (This is how you secure your accounts when using social login.)

Initially, the only way to tell if you are a victim is if Facebook signed you out of your account without warning. However, Facebook now says it will post a message at the top of your News Feed if your account was involved.

The Facebook hack holds special significance for MakeUseOf’s European readers; this is the first significant data breach from a major tech company since the EU enacted the General Data Protection (GDPR) law in May 2018

As Facebook is registered in Ireland, the Irish Data Protection Commission could issue Facebook with a huge fine under the terms of the GDPR, but as yet the Commissioner hasn’t clarified “the nature of the breach and the risk for users.”

If you are a Facebook hack victim, here are four things you need to do immediately.

2. Five Eyes Governments Attack Encryption

“The governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are committed to personal rights and privacy, and support the role of encryption in protecting those rights.”

Ministers from the Five Eyes governments—the U.S.A., United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand—met in Australia for the annual FCM. It was at this Five Country Ministerial that the above statement was drafted.

However, further inspection of the joint statement reveals that the Five Eyes allies are threatening to introduce legislation compelling tech giants such as Apple, Facebook, and Google to provide “lawful access solutions” to their products. In other words: the governments of Five Eyes countries want encryption backdoors, and they want them now.

Unfortunately, it is just not possible. Creating a backdoor for one person doesn’t stop it existing for others. Once the encryption backdoor is open the security of hundreds of millions of other law-abiding users evaporates.

It isn’t an issue that’s going away any time soon. Furthermore, there are numerous arguments against breaking encryption, but very few for. At times, encryption breaking tools such as GrayKey pop-up to give law enforcement a break, but they are few and far between. Other countries are considering an alternative approach. For instance, German Interior Ministry documents reference the use of Remote Communication Interception Software to target iOS, Android, and Blackberry devices without having to rely on service providers like Apple, Google, Facebook, and so on.

Police installing backdoors on the devices of their suspects? That’s another story.

3. British Airways Breach: 300,000 Customers Affected

UK flag carrier British Airways (BA) revealed that during the period from 22:58 on 21st August 2018 to 21:45 on 5th September 2018, the payment details of 300,000 customers were breached. (Yes, these oddly specific times come from BA.)

The stolen information contained the personal and financial information of any customers who booked with BA during that period. It didn’t, however, include the passport or identification document data for those customers. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today on Friday program, BA chairman and CEO Alex Cruz said the hack was “a sophisticated, malicious criminal attack” and that BA are “extremely sorry for what has happened.” Cruz also promised that BA was “100 percent committed” to compensating any affected customers.

BA hasn’t officially disclosed how the hack took place. However, security researchers at RiskIQ believe the hackers planted malicious code on the BA payment page via a modified version of the Modernizr JavaScript library. The malicious code uploaded stolen data to a server hosted in Romania. This is in turn part of a VPS provider named Time4VPS, based in Lithuania.

“The infrastructure used in this attack was set up only with British Airways in mind and purposely targeted scripts that would blend in with normal payment processing to avoid detection.”

Researchers traced the hack to a group called Magecart who are also responsible for recent attacks on Ticketmaster and Newegg.

4. ESET Discover First UEFI-Based Rootkit

Security researchers at ESET discovered the first-ever UEFI-based rootkit in the wild. The rootkit allows a hacker to install persistent malware on a vulnerable system with the potential to survive a full-system format.

The discovery of a UEFI rootkit is particularly galling as UEFI systems have traditionally remained secure against such threats. However, the rootkit presents a significant problem as it requires a full motherboard firmware flash to remove; your regular antivirus and antimalware programs won’t get near the rootkit.

“While it is hard to modify a system’s UEFI image, few solutions exist to scan system’s UEFI modules and detect malicious ones,” reads the ESET blog. “Moreover, cleaning a system’s UEFI firmware means re-flashing it, an operation not commonly done and certainly not by the average user. These advantages explain why determined and resourceful attackers will continue to target systems’ UEFI.”

The rootkit, known as LoJack, is thought to be the work of the infamous Russian-government linked hacking group, Fancy Bear. The hackers modified Absolute Software’s legitimate LoJack laptop anti-theft tool. The tool installs to the system BIOS to survive a system wipe. The modification replaces parts of the original LoJack code to rewrite vulnerable UEFI chips.

How do you protect against the UEFI rootkit? The easiest method is keeping UEFI Secure Boot turned on. Your system firmware will then reject any file without a proper verification certificate, keeping your system safe from harm.

5. North Korean Hacker Charged in WannaCry and Sony Hacks

The US government charged and sanctioned a North Korean hacker for the 2017 WannaCry global ransomworm attack, as well as the 2014 Sony Pictures hack that forced the company to withdraw its then-upcoming film, The Interview. (The Interview is a comedy about a plot to assassinate the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un.)

The indictment alleges that North Korean programmer, Park Jin Hyok, worked for a government front company with offices in China and the DPRK. Park and his colleagues are alleged to have engaged in malicious activity on behalf of the North Korean military.

fbi wanted posted for north korean hacker

“The scale and scope of the cyber-crimes alleged by the complaint is staggering and offensive to all who respect the rule of law and the cyber norms accepted by responsible nations,” said assistant attorney general John Demers. “The complaint alleges that the North Korean government, through a state-sponsored group, robbed a central bank and citizens of other nations, retaliated against free speech in order to chill it half a world away, and created disruptive malware that indiscriminately affected victims in more than 150 other countries, causing hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars’ worth of damage.”

The hacking group is also thought to be responsible for the unsuccessful hack attempt against Lockheed Martin. The group is also responsible for attacks against the Bank of Bangladesh, the Banco del Austro in Ecuador, Vietnam’s Tien Phong Bank, and a number of cryptocurrency exchanges.

The North Korean government hit back at the US indictment, labeling it a “smear campaign”. It also claims that Park is a “non-entity”. Understandable, given the circumstances.

Security News Roundup: September 2018

Those are five of the top security stories from September 2018. But a lot more happened; we just don’t have space to list it all in detail. Here are five more interesting security stories that popped up last month:

  • The US State Department confirmed a security breach affected the email of “less than 1% of employee inboxes.”
  • Data management firm, Veeam, exposed 445 million records for around ten days.
  • The US Attorney’s Office revealed how the Mirai botnet creators are helping the FBI investigate “complex” cybercrime cases. Their assistance keeps them clear of prison.
  • Uber picked up a $148 million fine for their 2017 data breach.
  • The average DDoS attack size has quintupled in size, to 26Gbps, according to Nexusguard.

A huge amount happens every month in cybersecurity, privacy, data protection, malware, and encryption. Check back next at the beginning of next month for your October 2018 security roundup. In the meantime, check out these five security breaches that might have put your data at risk!

Image Credit: Thought Catalog Books/Flickr

Read the full article: 50 Million Facebook Accounts Hacked: What Should You Do?


Read Full Article

Google files appeal against Europe’s $5BN antitrust fine for Android


Google has lodged its legal appeal against the European Commission’s €4.34 billion (~$5BN) antitrust ruling against its Android mobile OS, according to Reuters — the first step in a process that could keep its lawyers busy for years to come.

“We have now filed our appeal of the EC’s Android decision at the General Court of the EU,” it told the news agency, via email.

We’ve reached out to Google for comment on the appeals process.

Rulings made by the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg can be appealed to the top court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, but only on points of law.

Europe’s competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, announced the record-breaking antitrust penalty for Android in July, following more than two years of investigation of the company’s practices around its smartphone operating system.

Vestager said Google had abused the regional dominance of its smartphone platform by requiring that manufacturers pre-install other Google apps as a condition for being able to license the Play Store.

She also found the company had made payments to some manufacturers and mobile network operators in exchange for them exclusively pre-installing Google Search on their devices, and used Google Play licensing to prevent manufacturers from selling devices based on Android forks — which would not have to include Google services and, in Vestager’s view, “could have provided a platform for rival search engines as well as other app developers to thrive”.

Google rejected the Commission’s findings and said it would appeal.

In a blog post at the time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai argued the contrary — claiming the Android ecosystem has “created more choice, not less” for consumers, and saying the Commission ruling “ignores the new breadth of choice and clear evidence about how people use their phones today”.

According to Reuters the company reiterated its earlier arguments in reference to the appeal.

A spokesperson for the EC told us simply: “The Commission will defend its decision in Court.”


Read Full Article

The 7 Best VPNs for Linux


Linux has lots of benefits compared to Windows and macOS. One area where it can’t help you, however, is online privacy.

To be truly safe on the internet, you need to use a VPN. It will protect you from the prying eyes of governments, ISPs, and hackers. Here are the best VPNs for Linux—and we’ve even thrown in a couple of Linux VPN clients.

1. ExpressVPN

We begin the list of Linux VPNs with ExpressVPN, which happens to be one of the best VPNs for any device, period.

Since April 2016, the app has offered its own Linux-compatible app. It relies on the command line rather than providing a user interface, but it’s still easy to use.

If you’re running Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora, or CentOS, just download the installer and follow the on-screen instructions. You’ll need to add your activation code before you can use the service.

Once the installation is complete, you can connect to your nearest server from the command line by typing expressvpn connect. To see a list of the available servers, type expressvpn list. And to connect to a specific server, use expressvpn connect [LOCATION]. To disconnect from ExpressVPN, type expressvpn disconnect.

MakeUseOf readers can get a special 49% discount when signing up to ExpressVPN.

2. TorGuard

TorGuard offers more than 3,300 servers in 55 countries, thus making it one of the Linux VPNs with the most connection points.

The service has four standalone features:

  • Anonymous VPN Service: This is the core feature. TorGuard’s VPN will encrypt all your traffic. You can have up to five simultaneous connections along with unlimited speed and bandwidth.
  • Anonymous Proxy: The Anonymous Proxy will hide your IP address, unblock websites, and let you download content incognito.
  • Stealth VPN: Some sites and services don’t allow you to access their pages with a VPN. Stealth VPN will enable you to bypass such blocks.
  • Private Email: The Private Email feature uses OpenPGP email encryption so you can send messages without compromising your identity.

Unlike ExpressVPN, TorGuard does have a graphical user interface (GUI) on Linux. If you’re uncomfortable with using the command line, you might find it to be a better option.

TorGuard plans start at $9.99 per month.

3. NordVPN

Remember, before signing up for any VPN service, you need to establish what’s most important to you. Some VPNs have locations in hundreds of countries and specialize in accessing geo-blocked content. Others instead focus on offering the most robust security.

NordVPN’s falls into the latter category. Its features include a kill switch, DNS leak protection, IPv6 leak protection, and port forwarding. The company does not keep any logs and only supports the secure OpenVPN and Wireguard protocols.

Even making payments for NordVPN is private; you can pay for the for service using Bitcoin. NordVPN costs $6.99 per month if you sign up for a year.

On the downside, NordVPN is based in Sweden, which is a 14-eyes country. The jury is still out on how much a provider’s 14-eyes membership can affect your privacy. There’s also no GUI on Linux, so using the VPN is slightly more laborious for beginners.

4. AirVPN

AirVPN works on all the major Linux distros, including Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSUSE, Fedora, and Arch.

The service supports SSH, SSL, and Tor. It uses three types of encryption to keep you safe: 4096-bit RSA keys, an AES-256-CBC data channel, and an HMAC SHA1 control channel.

Importantly, AirVPN also offers no traffic limits, no maximum speed, no time limits, no logging, and up to five connections at the same time.

The company deserves massive credit for its Linux VPN client. Called Eddie, the app is open source. As such, you can use it to connect to any other VPN provider’s servers.

The VPN costs €7 per month. Uniquely, three-day plans are also available for €3. Like NordVPN, you can pay for AirVPN using Bitcoin.

5. Private Internet Access

Private Internet Access (PIA) is perennially popular among users. Despite being located in a Five-Eyes jurisdiction (the United States), PIA is reasonably secure. The company does not keep logs or any identifying information.

Indeed, when confronted with new Russian laws which required a company to keep logs of all traffic for 12 months, it shut down its operations in the country rather than comply.

From a features standpoint, PIA has more than 3,000 servers in 33 countries. PPTP, OpenVPN, and L2TP/IPSec are supported, and you can use five devices at the same time. There is also a dedicated Linux user interface.

You can buy Private Internet Access for less than $3 per month if you sign up for two years. The regular monthly price is $6.95.

6. Windscribe

What about free VPNs for Linux? If you want a reliable free VPN, your options are much more limited.

One of the most common free VPNs on Windows and Mac is TunnelBear. Unfortunately, it only has limited support for Linux. Therefore, we think the best free VPN for Linux is Windscribe. It is available on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and CentOS.

Windscribe Free gives you 10GB of data per month and access to servers in 10 countries. And, unlike some free VPNs, you still get all the security benefits of a paid plan, including no logging. If you want to upgrade to the pro plan, it will cost you $9 per month.

7. Tor

It’s always worth ending VPN article with a mention of Tor. It routes your traffic through an onion network, making it virtually impossible to trace. The Tor browser is available for Linux.

You should use Tor if you’re looking for a free option. Remember, you shouldn’t use a free VPN. With a free VPN, you are the product; they are notorious for logging, lousy business practice, and poor reliability.

Bonus: Qomui

Speaking of open source VPN clients, have a look at Qomui. It’s a frontend VPN GUI that’s compatible with any provider that supports OpenVPN. Some commentators have suggested it’s better than Eddie.

Note: Qomui does not offer a VPN service.

Secure Yourself on Linux

Using a Linux VPN is just one of the ways you can protect yourself while using your favorite distro.

If you would like to learn more about staying secure on Linux, check out our articles about Linux security issues you should be aware of and security tools you should always keep handy on Linux.

Read the full article: The 7 Best VPNs for Linux


Read Full Article

Google files appeal against Europe’s $5BN antitrust fine for Android


Google has lodged its legal appeal against the European Commission’s €4.34 billion (~$5BN) antitrust ruling against its Android mobile OS, according to Reuters — the first step in a process that could keep its lawyers busy for years to come.

“We have now filed our appeal of the EC’s Android decision at the General Court of the EU,” it told the news agency, via email.

We’ve reached out to Google for comment on the appeals process.

Rulings made by the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg can be appealed to the top court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, but only on points of law.

Europe’s competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, announced the record-breaking antitrust penalty for Android in July, following more than two years of investigation of the company’s practices around its smartphone operating system.

Vestager said Google had abused the regional dominance of its smartphone platform by requiring that manufacturers pre-install other Google apps as a condition for being able to license the Play Store.

She also found the company had made payments to some manufacturers and mobile network operators in exchange for them exclusively pre-installing Google Search on their devices, and used Google Play licensing to prevent manufacturers from selling devices based on Android forks — which would not have to include Google services and, in Vestager’s view, “could have provided a platform for rival search engines as well as other app developers to thrive”.

Google rejected the Commission’s findings and said it would appeal.

In a blog post at the time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai argued the contrary — claiming the Android ecosystem has “created more choice, not less” for consumers, and saying the Commission ruling “ignores the new breadth of choice and clear evidence about how people use their phones today”.

According to Reuters the company reiterated its earlier arguments in reference to the appeal.

A spokesperson for the EC told us simply: “The Commission will defend its decision in Court.”


Read Full Article

7 Psychological Tricks to Build Your Twitter Following


Building a large Twitter following isn’t something that happens overnight. But if you capitalize on human psychology, you can speed up that process a little.

Most people would deny that they are driven by psychological needs and desires, but the evidence proves otherwise.

In this article we explore some of the tactics you can use to entice people to follow you, and quickly boost your Twitter following.

1. Retweet Images With Strong Engagement

There is a lot of research out there showing that tweets with images get more engagement. Buffer conducted research that showed Twitter posts with images are retweeted 18 percent more often than those without.

Beyond just using images is how many people have already engaged with a post. When you retweet something that catches someone’s eye, they may consider following you if the post interests them.

On Psychology Today, Rob Henderson explains that to get people to act, you just need to convince them that other people are already taking action.

“Instead, we rely on signals like popularity. If everyone else is buying something, the reasoning goes, there is a good chance the item is worth our attention.”

You can capitalize on this by selecting things to retweet that already have high engagement numbers.

When people scroll down your timeline and see high engagement numbers at the bottom of these posts, it appears as though the engagement is with one of your own posts.

This gives the impression that a lot of people engage with your tweets and that you’re someone worth following. At the very least, it shows that you have your finger on the pulse of what’s popular.

2. Play on People’s Fear of Missing Out

When people are drawn to engage with your posts, they’re more likely to follow you for providing that positive experience. One of the best ways to entice that engagement is to trigger curiosity.

Marketers pay a lot of attention to what sparks a consumer’s curiosity enough so that they’ll try a new product. There are many ways to spark someone’s curiosity as they’re scrolling through their Twitter feed.

In his book The Psychology of Curiosity, psychologist George Loewenstein explains that there are five ways to induce “involuntary curiosity” in someone.

  1. Pose a question: When you pose an open question that challenges what people think they know, it triggers a curiosity response. People want to know if what they believe to be true is actually true. Loewenstein explains that this approach, “contronts the individual directly with missing information and is therefore perhaps the most straightforward curiosity inducer.”
  2. Guess an outcome: If you mention a news event in your post and comment on an expected outcome, it can entice people to follow you just to learn what happens. It can also entice people to follow you just to see how you react when you’re right or wrong.
  3. Violate expectations: If you really want to catch someone’s eye, post something that flies in the face of their expectations. Sharing new, shocking technology with followers suits this purpose well.
  4. Hint at hidden knowledge: If you’re an expert in a certain subject, craft your post in a way that suggests you have an important piece of information that people are missing. One tactic is saying a particular news article made you laugh. Loewenstein explains, “Watching someone chuckle as he or she reads a news article is likely to make one curious to see the article.”
  5. Bring up the past: Posting about something someone knew when they were younger, but might have forgotten, works well. This is more common on Facebook, but just as effective on Twitter. Loewenstein says, “Consider the enormous curiosity that is evoked by the recognition that one knew a piece of information but has forgotten it.”

Any of these tactics will trigger more engagement with your tweets. And when people engage with your posts, they’re more likely to follow you. Especially if you introduce them to something new or interesting.

3. Stay Positive

People are more likely to share or respond to positive tweets over negative one.

According to The Daily Dot, several studies conducted by scientists at the University of California and even Facebook confirmed that “positive emotions are more infectious than negative ones.”

This means that when someone sees a positive, funny post, they’re far more likely to like it and share it.

Better yet, researchers found that such tweets even have a positive psychological effect that spreads outside of Twitter. This means, every positive tweet you send spreads happiness out into the world well beyond the internet.

4. Use Embedded Images

A common way people use Twitter is just to scroll through their feed. They scan for interesting information they can gather straight from the tweets.

This means that the more information you can provide to people without requiring them to click through, the more likely they’re going to see value in your tweet.

Infographics (how to make cool infographics with Piktochart) are a fantastic way to do this.

Another common approach is to embed video into tweets. Making your own videos for social networks isn’t too difficult either. It takes very little effort for someone to pause scrolling just to watch a quick video you’ve shared.

And if you pepper in somewhat of a positive message in there as well, you’re killing two birds with one stone.

Embedding images and videos with lots of information in a small space is an effective way to drive engagement.

5. Target People Like You

Business Insider highlighted a study by Theodore Newcomb, who found that people are most attracted to people who are similar to them.

In his research, Newcomb put subjects in a University of Michigan house to live together. He measured their stance on different controversial topics, and by the end of the study found that his subjects gravitated more toward housemates who shared their beliefs.

This seems like common sense, but it’s actually a very powerful tool on social media.

You can search social networks by hashtags that match the niche you post about, and identify the people there who hold the same position you do on different topics.

When you spot some tweets from anyone with an interest that matches yours, you can take any approach to attract their attention. This could be a reply or a retweet. It’s even better if the person has a large number of followers. You could potentially grab the attention of those followers as well, especially if the person replies to or likes your comment.

Almost every time you do this, you’ll get some kind of response. Sometimes the person will return the favor and promote you or your work.

twitter hashtags

6. Post How-Tos

Quicksprout has an interesting article looking into which kind of posts get the most retweets on Twitter. This determines that how-to style tweets received more than three times more retweets than any other type of text-based tweet.

The psychology behind this is fairly obvious. If you touch on a topic that fills in someone’s knowledge gap, you’re likely to see engagement.

And when you’ve offered someone something useful to learn, they’re more likely to follow you in hopes that you’ll likely offer more to learn in the future as well.

7. If All Else Fails, Resort to Flattery

One study by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology revealed just how effective flattery is in advertising.

In the study, researchers showed different ads to student volunteers. Some of the ads flattered them, and others didn’t. Researchers found that the participants were more likely to use coupons offered by the brands that had complimented them.

This was true even though the students had, “discounted the value of the compliment because of its impersonal nature and the ulterior motive.”

The study revealed just how effective the psychology of flattery is. And this is just as true on Twitter as it is anywhere else.

It’s easy to do this when you’re browsing Twitter hashtags on the topics you care about. Whenever you come across something great someone tweeted, just take a moment and offer a compliment. It’s something every one of us would appreciate, so why not do it for others?

Most of the time it will win you another follower. At the very least, it can land you a like and a retweet to all of their followers.

Growing Your Twitter Following

Without a doubt, at times it can feel like a lot of work to grow your number of followers on Twitter. But a carefully curated list of followers is far more useful than a high volume of random ones.

It means the people who follow you have followed you for good reasons. So remember to  provide them with the valuable information and commentary they signed up for.

And if you’re just getting started on Twitter or you really don’t know where to begin, make sure to check out our definitive guide on how to use Twitter.

Read the full article: 7 Psychological Tricks to Build Your Twitter Following


Read Full Article

GDPR has cut ad trackers in Europe but helped Google, study suggests


An analysis of the impact of Europe’s new data protection framework, GDPR, on the adtech industry suggests the regulation has reduced the numbers of ad trackers that websites are hooking into EU visitors.

But it also implies that Google may have slightly increased its marketshare in the region — indicating the adtech giant could be winning at the compliance game at the expense of smaller advertising entities which the study also shows losing reach.

The research was carried out by the joint data privacy team of the anti-tracking browser Cliqz and the tracker blocker tool Ghostery (which merged via acquisition two years ago), using data from a service they jointly run, called WhoTracks.me — which they say is intended to provide greater transparency on the tracker market. (And therefore to encourage people to make use of their tracker blocker tools.)

A tale of two differently regulated regions

For the GDPR analysis, the team compared the prevalence of trackers one month before and one month after the introduction of the regulation, looking at the top 2,000 domains visited by EU or US residents.

On the tracker numbers front, they found that the average number of trackers per page dropped by almost 4% for EU web users from April to July.

Whereas the opposite was true in the US, with the average number of trackers per page rose by more than 8 percent over the same period.

In Europe, they found that the reduction in trackers was nearly universal across website types, with adult sites showing almost no change and only banking sites actually increasing their use of trackers.

In the US, the reverse was again true — with banking sites the only category to reduce tracker numbers over the analyzed period.

“The effects of the GDPR on the tracker landscape in Europe can be observed across all website categories. The reduction seems more prevalent among categories of sites with a lot of trackers,” they write, discussing the findings in a blog post. “Most trackers per page are still located on news websites: On average, they embed 12.4 trackers. Compared to April, however, this represents a decline of 7.5%.

“On ecommerce sites, the average number of trackers decreased by 6.9% to 9.5 per page. For recreation websites, the decrease is 6.7%, which corresponds to 10.7 trackers per page. A similar trend is observed for almost all other website categories. The only exception are banking sites, on which 7.4% more trackers were active in July than in April. However, the average number of trackers per page is only 2.6.”

Shifting marketshare

In the blog post they also argue that their snapshot comparison of tracker prevalence of April 2018 against July 2018 reveals “a clear picture” of GDPR’s impact on adtech marketshare — with “especially” smaller advertising trackers having “significantly” lost reach (which they are using as a proxy for marketshare).

In their analysis they found smaller tracker players lost between 18% and 31% reach/marketshare when comparing April (pre-GDPR) and July (post-GDPR).

They also found that Facebook suffered a decline of just under 7%.

Whereas adtech market leader Google was able to slightly increase its reach — by almost 1%.

Summing up their findings, Cliqz and Ghostery write: “For users this means that while the number of trackers asking for access to their data is decreasing, a tiny few (including Google) are getting even more of their data.”

The latter finding lends some weight to the argument that regulation can reinforce dominant players at the expense of smaller entities by further concentrating power — because big companies have greater resources to tackle compliance.

Although the data here is just a one-month snapshot. And the additional bump in marketshare being suggested for Google is not a huge one — whereas a nearly 7% drop in marketshare for Facebook is a more substantial impact.

Cliqz shared their findings with TechCrunch ahead of publication and we put several questions to them about the analysis, including whether or not the subsequent months (August, September) indicated this snapshot is a trend, i.e. whether or not Google sustained the additional marketshare.

However the company had not responded to our questions ahead of publication.

In the blog post Cliqz and Ghostery speculate that the larger adtech players might be winning (relatively speaking) the compliance game at the expense of smaller players because website owners are preferring to ‘play it safe’ and drop smaller entities vs big known platforms.

In the case of Google, they also flag up reports that suggest it has used its dominance of the adtech market to “encourage publishers to reduce the number of ad tech vendors and thus the number of trackers on their sites” — via a consent gathering tool that restricts the number of supply chain partners a publisher can share consent with to 12 vendors. 

And we’ve certainly heard complaints of draconian Google GDPR compliance terms before.

They also point to the use of manipulative UX design (aka dark patterns) that are used to “nudge users towards particular choices and actions that may be against their own interests”, suggesting these essentially deliberately confusing consent flows have been successfully tricking users into clicking and accepting “any kind of data collection” just to get rid of cryptic choices they’re being asked to understand. 

Given Google’s dominance of digital ad spending in Europe it stands to gain the most from websites’ use of manipulative consent flows.

However GDPR requires consent to be informed and freely given, not baffling and manipulative. So regulators should (hopefully) be getting a handle on any such transgressions and transgressors soon.

The continued existence of nightmarishly confused and convoluted consent flows is another complaint we’ve also heard before — much and often. (And one we have ourselves, frankly.)

Overall, according to the European Data Protection Board, a total of more than 42,000 complaints have been lodged so far with regulators, just four months into GDPR.

And just last week Europe’s data protection supervisor, Giovanni Buttarelli, told us to expect the first GDPR enforcement actions before the end of the year. So lots of EU consumers will already be warming up the popcorn.

But Cliqz and Ghostery argue that disingenuous attempts to manipulate consent might need additional regulatory tweaks to be beaten back — calling in their blog post for regulations to enforce machine-readable standards to help iron away flakey flows.

“The next opportunity for that would be the ePrivacy regulation,” they suggest, referencing the second big privacy rules update Europe is (still) working on. “It would be desirable, for example, if ePrivacy required that the privacy policies of websites, information on the type and scope of data collection by third parties, details of the Data Protection Officer and reports on data incidents must be machine-readable.

“This would increase transparency and create a market for privacy and compliance where industry players keep each other in check.”

It would also, of course, provide another opportunity for pro-privacy tools to make themselves even more useful to consumers.


Read Full Article

Google Unveils the Pixel 3, Pixel Slate, and Home Hub


Google has unveiled a bunch of new hardware, including the Pixel 3, the Pixel Slate, and the Home Hub. The Pixel 3 is exactly what we expected after a series of leaks, and both the Pixel Slate and Home Hub are interesting enough to warrant a closer look.

Now dominant online, in recent years Google has tried its hand at hardware as well. So we have smartphones, Chromebooks, the Chromecast, Google Home, and Nest devices all made by Google. And we now have three more Google products to consider buying.

Google Unveils New Hardware

Google unveiled its new hardware at a glossy event in New York City on October 9th, 2018.

The Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL are Google’s new flagship Android devices. The Pixel 3 boasts a 5.5-inch screen, a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, 4GB of RAM, dual front-facing cameras, and a single 12.2MP camera on the rear. The XL is exactly the same except for its 6.3-inch screen.

The Pixel Slate is Google’s new Chrome OS tablet. It boasts a 12.3-inch screen bordered by front-facing stereo speakers. You get cameras front and rear, two USB-C ports, and 4K video output. Unfortunately, there’s no 3.5mm headphone jack. Prices start at $599.

The Home Hub is Google’s answer to the Amazon Echo Show and Portal from Facebook. Which means it’s essentially a tablet on a stand. Home Hub is powered by Google Assistant, and is designed to help you work, rest, and play. Home Hub is competitively priced at $149.

Google Ups Its Hardware Game

On paper the new Google hardware represents the company upping its game. The Pixel 3 looks like being a superb smartphone, the Pixel Slate looks to be Google’s best tablet to date, and the Home Hub would be a small but powerful addition to any smart home.

If you already own some Google hardware we’ve got you covered. We’ve previously published articles on setting up and using your Google Home and setting up and using your Chromecast. We also have the ultimate how-to guide for Chromebook beginners.

Read the full article: Google Unveils the Pixel 3, Pixel Slate, and Home Hub


Read Full Article

Google Pixel’s product directors on single cameras and notches


Google hardware launches are never spec-fests. The search giant would rather just sit on the sideline while companies like Apple and Samsung battle it out on that front. In fact, numbers like screen resolution, processor speed and battery capacity were conspicuously absent from today’s presentation.

Instead, the company seems more content to have hardware serve the product’s software — it’s a strategy that certainly makes sense given the company’s background. That often means that products like the Pixel don’t offer major spec upgrades year over year, instead relying on breakthroughs in AI, ML and the like to take them to the next level.

As such, the company regularly tosses out words like “pragmatic” and “practical” when discussing the decisions made in service of producing the Pixel 3. One such move was the continued reliance on a single rear-facing camera, when the competition is adding two or three to get the job done.

“We look at all of the different configurations we can get,” VP of Product Management Brian Rakowski tells TechCrunch. “If we would have added another lens, it would have given us no benefit over what we get with one really good lens.”

The simple answer is that the company was able to accomplish most of what it set out to do with a combination of “one really good camera” and software tricks like digital zoom, ultra low-light shooting and depth perception. That last bit is doubly important both for creating the bokeh effect in portrait mode and helping deliver augmented reality experiences through ARCore.

Senior Director of Product Management Sabrina Ellis says the company did consider a wide-angle lens for the rear of the device, but ultimately, “it wasn’t as much of a pain point.” It was, however, enough of an issue to warrant its addition to the front of the device.

That decision is what lead to the mismatched notches on the Google Pixel 3 (no notch) and Pixel 3 XL (giant notch). While the company has happily embraced hashtag notch life in Android Pie, the smaller Pixel’s slim profile wouldn’t have benefited from the addition of a notch.

“With the small one,” Rakowski explains, “it turns out the space is just too small when you put the wide-angle lens in. It’s a narrower phone, so you have room for an icon or two, whereas on the bigger phone everything you need for the status icons is up there, and it’s a very good use of the space.”

When I suggested the company was “notch agnostic,” both execs laughed in agreement. The hardware, Rakowski explained, is secondary to the overall experience. “We’re not obsessed with the specs,” he says. “We’re obsessed with the features and experiences.”

more Google Event 2018 coverage


Read Full Article

Indie farm-em-up Stardew Valley is coming to iOS and Android


Stardew Valley, the hit indie farming game made by one guy in his spare time, is coming to mobile. I’ve dropped dozens of hours into this charming little spiritual successor to Harvest Moon, and now I know how I’m going to spend my next few plane rides.

In case you’re not aware, Stardew Valley is a game where you inherit a farm near a lovely little town and must restore it, befriend (and romance) the locals, fish, fight your way through caverns, forage for spring onions and wild horseradish, mine ore, and… well, there’s a lot. Amazingly, it was created entirely by one person, Eric Barone, who taught himself to code, make pixel art, compose music, and do literally everything. And yes, it took a long time. (GQ of all things wrote an interesting profile recently.)

Fortunately it was a huge hit, to Barone’s great surprise and no doubt pleasure, and deservedly so.

Originally released for the PC, Stardew Valley has since expanded (with the help of non-Barone teams) to the major consoles and is now coming to iOS — undiminished, Barone was careful to point out in a blog post. This game is big, but nothing is left out from the mobile port.

“”It’s the full game, not a cut down version, and plays almost identically to all other versions,” he wrote. “The main difference is that it has been rebuilt for touch-screen gameplay on iOS (new UI, menu systems and controls).”

Barone has added a lot to the game since its release in early 2016, and the mobile version will include those updates up to 1.3 — meaning you’ll have several additional areas and features but not the multiplayer options most recently added. Those are planned, however, so if you want to do a co-op farm you’ll just have to wait a bit. No mods will be supported, alas.

In a rare treat for mobile ports, you can take your progress from the PC version and transfer it to iOS via iTunes. No need to start over again, which, fun as it is, can be a bit daunting when you realize how much time you’ve put into the game to start with.

I can’t recommend Stardew Valley enough, and the controls should be more than adequate for the laid-back gameplay it offers (combat is fairly forgiving). It’ll cost $8 in the App Store starting October 24 (Android version coming soon), half off the original $15 price — which I must say was amazingly generous to begin with. You can’t go wrong here, trust me.


Read Full Article

Pixel 2 vs Pixel 3: Should you upgrade?


If you’re considering making the jump to Google’s newly announced Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL, you’re in the right place. Whether you’re a Pixel 2 owner eyeing greener pastures or a bargain type hunting for a last-gen smartphone that’s still top of the line, comparing new and old is often useful.

On specs alone, the Pixel 3 shares most of its DNA with the Pixel 2, but there are a handful of meaningful differences and they’re not all obvious. What is obvious: The Pixel 3’s AMOLED screen is now 5.5 inches compared to the Pixel 2’s 5 inch display. The Pixel 3 XL now offers a 6.3 inch display, up .3 inches from the Pixel 2 XL.

The Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL upgrade the Pixel 2’s processor slightly and add an additional front-facing camera for some of the device’s newest tricks. The primary camera also gets an under-the-hood upgrade to its visual co-processing chip, called Visual Core. The Visual Core chip update is what powers some of the new camera features that we’ll get into in just a bit.

Pixel 3 XL

Beyond that, the hardware looks very similar for the most part, though the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL do offer some changes in screen size, like we mentioned. Most noticeably, the Pixel 3 XL has an iPhone-like notch this time around while the notchless Pixel 3 offers a reduced bezel but no edge-to-edge screen.

Pixel 2 XL

The Pixel 3 starts at $799 (64GB of storage) while the base model Pixel 2 is currently priced at $649, though more price drops could be in store. The Pixel 3 XL starts at $899 for 64GB of storage and offers 128GB for $999. The Pixel 2 XL is more deeply discounted than its smaller sibling at the moment with a 64GB base option on sale for $699. If it sounds complicated, it’s not really. Each Pixel comes in two sizes: 64GB or 128GB and more storage costs $100 bucks extra.

The black and white Pixel 2 XL

With the Pixel 3, Google has unified the color scheme across both sizes of device, offering “Just Black,” “Clearly White” with an eye-catching seafoam colored button and a very Apple-like “Not Pink” that comes with a coral colored button.

Google’s Pixel 2 also came in black and white but also a muted greyish blue color, which was cool. The Pixel 2 XL came in all black or black and white with a brightly colored power button, so we’re a little sad to see that colorway go. Google also noted in its launch event that the new phones feel more comfortable to hold, though we’d have to try that out with the Pixel 3 XL to see if that really holds true.

Like we said, if you’re not vehemently anti-notch the hardware isn’t that different. The dual front-facing camera is the most substantial change. But since we’re talking about Google phones what we’re really talking about is software and when it comes to software Google has held some substantial perks exclusive to the Pixel 3.

We spoke to Google to clarify what features won’t be coming to the Pixel 2, at least not yet:

  • Photobooth: The hands-free selfie mode that snaps photos when you smile
  • Top Shot: Burst photo mode that picks your best shots.
  • Super Res Zoom: A new machine learning-powered camera mode that merges many burst images to fill in additional details.
  • Wide angle selfies: That extra front-facing camera wasn’t for nothing. Mark my words, this is the Pixel 3’s real killer feature, even if it takes a while to catch on.
  • Motion Auto focus: A camera mode that allows you to tap a subject once and track it while it moves.
  • Lens Suggestions: A new mode for Google Lens.
  • Titan M: A new security chip with a cool name that Google touts for providing enterprise-level security.
  • Wireless charging: Either a big deal to you or it’s not.

Thrift-minded shoppers and fairly content Pixel 2 owners fear not. There are plenty of new features that don’t rely on hardware improvements and will be coming to vintage Pixels. Those include Call Screen, Night Sight, Playground (the AR sticker thing) and Digital Wellbeing, already available in beta.

So, do you need to upgrade? Well, as always, that’s a very personal and often very nitpickily detail-oriented question. Are you dying for a slight but not unsubstantial bump in screen real estate? Does Google’s very solid lineup of cool new camera modes entice you? Is wireless charging an absolute dealmaker?

As for me, I’m perfectly happy with the Pixel 2 for now, but as someone who regularly takes front-facing photos with more than one human in them, that extra-wide group selfie mode does beckon. If I were still using a first generation Pixel I’d be all over the Pixel 3, but my device has a ton of life left in it.

The Pixel 2 is still one of the best smartphones ever made and it’s more affordable now than before. Even with last-gen hardware — often the best deal for smartphone shoppers — you can rest easy knowing that Google won’t abandon the Pixel 2. In fact, the guarantee of vanilla Android as Google intended it with prompt updates is usually a big part of the reason for anyone to consider a Pixel.

A Google spokesperson emphasized that as always with its flagship smartphone line, the company will “try to bring as many features as possible to existing phones so they keep getting better over time.”


Read Full Article

Pixel 2 vs Pixel 3: Should you upgrade?


If you’re considering making the jump to Google’s newly announced Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL, you’re in the right place. Whether you’re a Pixel 2 owner eyeing greener pastures or a bargain type hunting for a last-gen smartphone that’s still top of the line, comparing new and old is often useful.

On specs alone, the Pixel 3 shares most of its DNA with the Pixel 2, but there are a handful of meaningful differences and they’re not all obvious. What is obvious: The Pixel 3’s AMOLED screen is now 5.5 inches compared to the Pixel 2’s 5 inch display. The Pixel 3 XL now offers a 6.3 inch display, up .3 inches from the Pixel 2 XL.

The Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL upgrade the Pixel 2’s processor slightly and add an additional front-facing camera for some of the device’s newest tricks. The primary camera also gets an under-the-hood upgrade to its visual co-processing chip, called Visual Core. The Visual Core chip update is what powers some of the new camera features that we’ll get into in just a bit.

Pixel 3 XL

Beyond that, the hardware looks very similar for the most part, though the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL do offer some changes in screen size, like we mentioned. Most noticeably, the Pixel 3 XL has an iPhone-like notch this time around while the notchless Pixel 3 offers a reduced bezel but no edge-to-edge screen.

Pixel 2 XL

The Pixel 3 starts at $799 (64GB of storage) while the base model Pixel 2 is currently priced at $649, though more price drops could be in store. The Pixel 3 XL starts at $899 for 64GB of storage and offers 128GB for $999. The Pixel 2 XL is more deeply discounted than its smaller sibling at the moment with a 64GB base option on sale for $699. If it sounds complicated, it’s not really. Each Pixel comes in two sizes: 64GB or 128GB and more storage costs $100 bucks extra.

The black and white Pixel 2 XL

With the Pixel 3, Google has unified the color scheme across both sizes of device, offering “Just Black,” “Clearly White” with an eye-catching seafoam colored button and a very Apple-like “Not Pink” that comes with a coral colored button.

Google’s Pixel 2 also came in black and white but also a muted greyish blue color, which was cool. The Pixel 2 XL came in all black or black and white with a brightly colored power button, so we’re a little sad to see that colorway go. Google also noted in its launch event that the new phones feel more comfortable to hold, though we’d have to try that out with the Pixel 3 XL to see if that really holds true.

Like we said, if you’re not vehemently anti-notch the hardware isn’t that different. The dual front-facing camera is the most substantial change. But since we’re talking about Google phones what we’re really talking about is software and when it comes to software Google has held some substantial perks exclusive to the Pixel 3.

We spoke to Google to clarify what features won’t be coming to the Pixel 2, at least not yet:

  • Photobooth: The hands-free selfie mode that snaps photos when you smile
  • Top Shot: Burst photo mode that picks your best shots.
  • Super Res Zoom: A new machine learning-powered camera mode that merges many burst images to fill in additional details.
  • Wide angle selfies: That extra front-facing camera wasn’t for nothing. Mark my words, this is the Pixel 3’s real killer feature, even if it takes a while to catch on.
  • Motion Auto focus: A camera mode that allows you to tap a subject once and track it while it moves.
  • Lens Suggestions: A new mode for Google Lens.
  • Titan M: A new security chip with a cool name that Google touts for providing enterprise-level security.
  • Wireless charging: Either a big deal to you or it’s not.

Thrift-minded shoppers and fairly content Pixel 2 owners fear not. There are plenty of new features that don’t rely on hardware improvements and will be coming to vintage Pixels. Those include Call Screen, Night Sight, Playground (the AR sticker thing) and Digital Wellbeing, already available in beta.

So, do you need to upgrade? Well, as always, that’s a very personal and often very nitpickily detail-oriented question. Are you dying for a slight but not unsubstantial bump in screen real estate? Does Google’s very solid lineup of cool new camera modes entice you? Is wireless charging an absolute dealmaker?

As for me, I’m perfectly happy with the Pixel 2 for now, but as someone who regularly takes front-facing photos with more than one human in them, that extra-wide group selfie mode does beckon. If I were still using a first generation Pixel I’d be all over the Pixel 3, but my device has a ton of life left in it.

A Google spokesperson emphasized that as always with its flagship smartphone line, the company will “try to bring as many features as possible to existing phones so they keep getting better over time.”

The Pixel 2 is still one of the best smartphones ever made and it’s more affordable now than before. Even with last-gen hardware — often the best deal for smartphone shoppers — you can rest easy knowing that Google won’t abandon the Pixel 2.


Read Full Article

Hands on with Google’s Pixel Slate


Google unveiled a new lineup of devices today, including the Pixel Slate, a tablet that the company described as the next evolution of Chrome OS — but could also be seen as the company’s answer to both Apple’s iPad and Microsoft’s Surface.

After the presentation, I had a chance to try the Pixel Slate out for myself. There wasn’t time to test out everything (a packed room full of journalists isn’t the best place to try out the speakers, and there didn’t seem to be much new with the accompanying Google Pen) but it was enough to get a taste of the main selling points.

The first thing I noticed was the screen. Google is pitching this as a device that can be used for both work and entertainment, with a particular emphasis on content creators.  The display seems to be up to the task — it’s 12.3 inches in size, with a resolution of 203ppi. The result is that everything from YouTube videos to email composition screens looked sharp and vivid.

There’s also an emphasis on thinness and lightness. The Pixel Slate has an official weight of 1.6 pounds, and it did feel easy to carry, and to adjust the angle to my liking using the case/stand. (The real test, of course, will be seeing how my arms and fingers felt after several hours of Netflix.)

There’s also an optional keyboard. It includes nice touches like rounded keys, but I was most intrigued by the quietness touted by Google’s presenters. Loyal TechCrunch readers will know that I’m a notoriously loud typer, so I couldn’t resist trying to bash away at it.

Turns out it was as quiet as promised. To be honest, I would’ve appreciated a little more noise, but I’m sure everyone in my immediate vicinity felt otherwise. And even with the relative absence of sound, the experience was still satisfyingly tactile — I didn’t hear the keys, but I felt them clacking under my fingers.

The Slate also appeared to move seamlessly back-and-forth between desktop and tablet modes. As the name suggests, desktop mode looks like a more mouse- and keyboard-oriented interface (with capabilities like snapping two applications side-by-side as a splitscreen), while tablet mode a more standard, touch-friendly interface, along with an on-screen keyboard.

The Slate automatically snaps back-and-forth between the modes — in my demo, you just had to pull it away from the aforementioned keyboard to trigger the switch, though apparently it’s the presence of a trackpad or mouse that really makes the difference.

Other features front- and rear-facing cameras, Google Assistant and a fingerprint reader. Pricing starts at $599, with an additional $199 for the keyboard and $99 for the Pen.

more Google Event 2018 coverage


Read Full Article

Hands on with Google’s Pixel Slate


Google unveiled a new lineup of devices today, including the Pixel Slate, a tablet that the company described as the next evolution of Chrome OS — but could also be seen as the company’s answer to both Apple’s iPad and Microsoft’s Surface.

After the presentation, I had a chance to try the Pixel Slate out for myself. There wasn’t time to test out everything (a packed room full of journalists isn’t the best place to try out the speakers, and there didn’t seem to be much new with the accompanying Google Pen) but it was enough to get a taste of the main selling points.

The first thing I noticed was the screen. Google is pitching this as a device that can be used for both work and entertainment, with a particular emphasis on content creators.  The display seems to be up to the task — it’s 12.3 inches in size, with a resolution of 203ppi. The result is that everything from YouTube videos to email composition screens looked sharp and vivid.

There’s also an emphasis on thinness and lightness. The Pixel Slate has an official weight of 1.6 pounds, and it did feel easy to carry, and to adjust the angle to my liking using the case/stand. (The real test, of course, will be seeing how my arms and fingers felt after several hours of Netflix.)

There’s also an optional keyboard. It includes nice touches like rounded keys, but I was most intrigued by the quietness touted by Google’s presenters. Loyal TechCrunch readers will know that I’m a notoriously loud typer, so I couldn’t resist trying to bash away at it.

Turns out it was as quiet as promised. To be honest, I would’ve appreciated a little more noise, but I’m sure everyone in my immediate vicinity felt otherwise. And even with the relative absence of sound, the experience was still satisfyingly tactile — I didn’t hear the keys, but I felt them clacking under my fingers.

The Slate also appeared to move seamlessly back-and-forth between desktop and tablet modes. As the name suggests, desktop mode looks like a more mouse- and keyboard-oriented interface (with capabilities like snapping two applications side-by-side as a splitscreen), while tablet mode a more standard, touch-friendly interface, along with an on-screen keyboard.

The Slate automatically snaps back-and-forth between the modes — in my demo, you just had to pull it away from the aforementioned keyboard to trigger the switch, though apparently it’s the presence of a trackpad or mouse that really makes the difference.

Other features front- and rear-facing cameras, Google Assistant and a fingerprint reader. Pricing starts at $599, with an additional $199 for the keyboard and $99 for the Pen.

more Google Event 2018 coverage


Read Full Article